Codexnews Luxemburg

Home Page
Registration
Registration
Registration
Registration
Registration



SpanishGermanItalianFrenchRomanianPortuguese

Home Page | Subjects | Event | Media | Directory | Search | Registration | Links | Jobs | Log in
Presentation | FAQ | Contact | Security Info | General conditions | List of articles | Newsletters
Add Document | Alert | Directory Subscription

News Flash
Share on: Linkedin | Facebook | Twitter Go Print Send this article to a friend Back  Back

Title of Document: Chamber judgment Prencipe v. Monaco
Keywords: inhuman or degrading treatment,right to liberty and security
Author: cmiskp.echr.coe.

Codex-online publication date: 07/20/2009 12:42:17 PM
Date of Original Publication: 07/16/2009
Country: Monaco
Summary: Principal facts

The applicant, Josette Prencipe, is a French national who was born in 1940 and lives in Nice (France). She stands charged with having misappropriated several million euros when she worked as a bank employee in Monaco. When first questioned on 6 January 2004, she confessed to misappropriating the money, explaining that she had acted on instructions given over the telephone by unknown voices, and that she had not made any personal profit from her actions. The next day she was charged and remanded in custody. Appeals and requests for her release lodged by the applicant and her counsel were rejected. The appeals were based in particular on the duration of the detention and the applicant’s state of health, which was allegedly incompatible with her continued detention. On 13 December 2007, while the criminal proceedings were in progress, Mrs Prencipe was released “in order to comply with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the reasonable length of detention pending trial”.


Principal facts

The applicant, Josette Prencipe, is a French national who was born in 1940 and lives in Nice (France). She stands charged with having misappropriated several million euros when she worked as a bank employee in Monaco. When first questioned on 6 January 2004, she confessed to misappropriating the money, explaining that she had acted on instructions given over the telephone by unknown voices, and that she had not made any personal profit from her actions. The next day she was charged and remanded in custody. Appeals and requests for her release lodged by the applicant and her counsel were rejected. The appeals were based in particular on the duration of the detention and the applicant’s state of health, which was allegedly incompatible with her continued detention. On 13 December 2007, while the criminal proceedings were in progress, Mrs Prencipe was released “in order to comply with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the reasonable length of detention pending trial”.

For the entire article, please see the attached file:
Caz577Eng.doc78 Kb

Back
 Back
 


Home Page | Subjects | Event | Media | Directory | Search | Registration | Links | Log in


Español|Deutsch|Italiano|Français|Romana|Portuguais
Spanish
 
German
 
Italian
 
French
 
Romanian
 
Portuguese
^


File Attachment Icon
Caz577Eng.doc