|
|
|
 |
| HOLDING REFUGEES FOR THREE MONTHS IN POLICE HEADQUARTERS’ BASEMENT BREACHED THE CONVENTION | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey (No. 2) .
The Court held , unanimously, a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) – with regard to the detention at Hasköy police headquarters –of the European Convention on Human Rights.
| | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| APPLICATION CONCERNING A CLAIM FOR LESS THAN 1 EURO INADMISSIBLE | In his admissibility decision Korolev (II) v. Russia the European Court of Human Rights considers that the a violation of a right, however real from a purely legal point of view, had to attain a minimum level of severity to warrant consideration by an international court. The assessment of that minimum level was relative and depended on all the circumstances of the case. The Court was struck by the fact that Mr Korolev’s grievances had been explicitly limited to the failure to payhim a sum equivalent to less than a euro | | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| DETENTION WAS INCOMPATIBLE WITH APPLICANT’S STATE OF HEALTH | [The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Rokosz v. Poland . The Court considers that the detention was incompatible with applicant’s state of health .
The Court held, unanimously, a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights,
| | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| REFERENCE TO STEREOTYPED IMAGE OF ROMA IN ACADEMIC STUDY AND DICTIONARY NOT DISCRIMINATORY | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Aksu v. Turkey . The Court considers that the reference to stereotyped image of roma in academic study and dictionary not discriminatory .
The Court held a no violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
| | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| 2000 DAYS’ IMPRISONMENT FOR BREACHING BAIL CONDITIONS WAS EXCESSIVE | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of Gatt v. Malta . The Court considers that the 2000 days’ imprisonment for breaching bail conditions was excessive.
The Court held unanimously, [violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
| | Published in 27-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| ASYLUM-SEEKER HELD ILLEGALLY IN SQUALID CONDITIONS IN GREEK DETENTION CENTRE | The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of A. A. v. Greece . The Court considers that the applicant, a asylum-seeker, held illegally in squalid conditions in Greek detention centre.
The Court held , unanimously:
- a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and
-a violation of Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 (righto liberty and security)
of the European Convention on Human Rights | | Published in 22-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
| DIFFERENT TREATMENT AS REGARDS EXTENSION OF INSURANCE COVER DISCRIMINATED AGAINST HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE | [The European Court of Human Rights has notified in writing its Chamber judgment in the case of P.B. and J.S. v. Austria . The Court considers that the different treatment as regards extension of insurance cover discriminated against homosexual couple .
The Court held a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights unil 30 June 2007 and a no violation after that date | | Published in 22-07-2010 by cmiskp.echr.coe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|